Response to Movies: Lucy Calderon

I really enjoyed reading one of Lucy's responses to movies because of how she found a personal connection to the topic.  We learn best when we can connect our lives to a lesson.  I can agree with Lucy that even though we can get movies so many ways through the Internet nowadays, we still find joy in going to the movies.  I think a lot of people can relate to Lucy that we still love going to the movies so much because it is a social experience.  I can also relate to Lucy that going to the movies also serves as a stress reliever from the "outside world".  I think Lucy's point that there are usually no interruptions is what keeps people leaning towards going to the theater.  Lucy did a great job reflecting on this lecture and really made me think what my reasons are for going to the movie theater.
The link to Lucy's response is here

Response to Lights, Camera, Terms: Sydney Tucker

I thought Sydney made some great points that I can relate to.  After learning what the TV News Terminology is I realize that through the local news unit, I have witnessed all those terms.  I agree with Sydney that it is nice that we can now use the professional way to name what is on the new show.  I look back and realize especially the amount of tosses I have seen show after show.  Sydney made a valid point that now that we know the terms, we are more observant for these terminology.  When we are more observant, we are interpreting the news closer and more sufficiently.  I thought Sydney did a well done job explaining what she got out of this lesson.  I lastly have to compliment Sydney for her creative title!
The link to Sydney's post is here

Response to Recorded Music: Cameron Tucker

I really enjoyed reading Cameron Tucker's response to the lecture on recording music.  I have to give her a lot of credit for taking the information we learned and applying it.  After learning about how Internet is demassifing record labels, it never reoccurred to me that famous stars like Justin Beiber were first found on the Internet.  I think that example gives us that big picture to how big the Internet is demassifing record labels.  I think the Internet has made the process of getting your name out there in music a lot easier.  I mean before, you would have to go around many different labels, being lucky and maybe getting a deal whereas now we have YouTube to get people on the spotlight.  I have to agree with Cameron that this specific lecture really made me think how much the Internet is not just affecting record labels, but other mediums.  I hope one day there is a better medium that will demassify the Internet like the Internet is doing to every other medium.  Cameron did a very nice job reflecting on this lecture on recording!

Response to Radio: Piper Hansen

I found Piper Hansen's response to the lecture on radio very interesting.  Piper had a good point that even back then they used radio as a form of advertising.  I just assumed I guess that the annoying advertisements on the radio were kind of a new thing like in the past 20 years or so.  I remember when Mr. Miller told us that KDKA was the oldest radio station, but I didn't reflect on it that much.  I liked how Piper went out of her time to listen to the station.  We learn something new everyday, who knew that a station with such a legacy and background would be filled with too much weather and traffic.  I think all stations have too much junk now a days, it is definitely not just KDKA.  Piper Hansen's reflection on radio was very helpful and well written.

The link to Piper's post is here

Response to Movies: Thomas Simmons

Thomas Simmons made some very valid points about the lectures on movies.  I really never thought about how much movies have shaped the economy.  Like Thomas said, the movie industry provides a lot of jobs.  I liked Thomas' example about the movie Hugo.  Movies are so vivid that you feel like you are inside the movie these days, except we know we aren't. In Thomas' example, he talks about how in the movie Hugo, people were watching a movie about a train moving towards the camera leaving the audience thinking they were going to get hit by a train.  Of course the time period in the movie Hugo was a lot earlier than today.  Lastly, I will have to agree with what Thomas said about movie theaters.  We all knew that the Internet was taking over the movie worth but we didn't realize truthfully that with the situations they have, they aren't doing that bad.  I think Thomas did a great job taking the information we learned and connecting it to the real world.
The link to Thomas' post is here

Response to Television is a Waste: Melissa Perello

I thought Melissa Perello's response to the television lecture was very well written.  I agree with her that this specific lecture was not the most interesting compared to the others.  Melissa and I have something in common that we don't find time to watch television during the week, so I think the lecture didn't appeal to us because we couldn't relate to it as much as the other lectures.  I liked Melissa's example on the domino effect of television's impacts.  For example, the shows becoming 24/7 resulted to people watching TV for about 7 hours a day which lead to people staying indoors which can lead to obesity and so forth.  I can go on and on with the domino effect and that is why I thought Melissa's simile was so great.   I liked how Melissa concluded that although the Internet seems to be demassifing everything, the Internet will probably one day demassify?  I wonder what new technology in the future will be the one to do so?  Overall, Melissa did a great job over viewing the lecture and made some good points.
The link to Melissa's post is here

Television

 Television is so important to the everyday days lives of Americans.  I learned from this lecture that on average, Americans spend 7 hours a day watching TV.  I can not relate to this because I don't watch TV during the week.  I liked this lecture but I did not think it was as interesting compared to the other mass mediums.  I think it is because I knew most of information prior to this topic.  We have watched so much TV in our lifetime that I have seen most of television's impacts.  Although, I really liked the discussion on the impact of politics on TV.  Everyone can agree that they have seen hundreds of Matt Bevin and Jack Conway commercials.  I knew it was to get attention, but I liked getting to know more information of the dos and the don'ts of political ads.  For example, a strategy might be to have a lot of mean ads making people not want to vote, resulting in one side having more "no matter what" followers to vote still.   I agree that most of the issues, shows "try to project" are not helping the issues because they fluff them up too much.  As I said before, to me this lecture was not as interesting as the others but that is just my opinion.  I wish we could have gotten into the history of the first shows, but overall this lesson was insightful.